" To
enhance undergraduate learning in the liberal arts by
promoting use of library special collections"

Participating
Institutions

|
Events > Eyes
in Connecticut
EYES IN CONNECTICUT: DEVELOPING 21st CENTURY
VISUAL LITERACY TO FOCUS ON SPECIAL COLLECTIONS
The Teagle Special Collections Project /
Workshop Two
Yale University
March 3, 2006
9:00 a.m. – 4:30 p.m.
Sponsorship for this workshop was provided by
the Teagle Foundation grant for leading Connecticut partnerships
in enhancement of liberal arts education and also supported
by the Davies Educational Foundation grant on collections based
teaching and learning at Yale. Yale faculty and staff provided
the lectures of the workshop.The day-long workshop was held
on March 3, 2006 in the Sterling Memorial Library, and convened
by Ann Okerson, Associate University Librarian, Associate
University Librarian for Collections and International Programs,
and Danuta Nitecki, Associate University Librarian Public
Services, Yale University.
In her introduction, Ms. Nitecki
provided a short characterization of the sponsors, who
have provided the library with extraordinary support in
expanding ways to educate students in the basic methods
of research and the use of the rich, special and specialized
collections of resources available at the libraries both
here and in Connecticut.
William Rando,
Director of the Graduate Teaching Center, opened the workshop
with an introduction to visual literacy in the classroom.
His presentation was titled Special
Collections: Out of the Stacks and Into the Classroom.
His definitions of visual literacy provided a useful
framework analyzing the contributions of the other speakers
at the workshop. Rando introduced the overarching
term "visual
fluency" to
define what teachers want their students to learn
with respect to images. The concept captures the research
aspect of working with images related to information
literacy, as well as the specific skills, needed to
work with images. This approach much stresses what students
will learn to do rather than what knowledge they will
acquire. Visual fluency can be broken down into 4 competencies:
- Understanding
images -
This touches on how an image is created, the timing, the media
used, etc. Learning to understand images means changing
a student's conception of what information is available
and how it is presented. Ultimately, it could result in
a paradigm shift in world view, which sometimes is what
teachers want to accomplish. Success in teaching is best achieved
when students are confronted with information that is
presented in more than one way in combination with ample
opportunity for reflection.
- Finding images -
Beyond the ‘search Google Images’ strategy, finding the right
images is not easy; and even if students are skilled information retrievers,
finding images requires different search strategies than finding texts or
facts. The best teaching practices create lots of opportunities for practice,
and make sure that finding images avoids the ‘find these 10 items’ assignments
without meaning or context.
- Reading images -
To be able to ‘read’ an image means to be
able to identify elements of images, e.g. a
dot, line, direction, motion, hue, saturation, etc. Another
approach would be to investigate the general provenance
of an image. Best teaching strategies focus on one approach.
- Speaking with
images -
In order to be able to speak with images, make a point or construct
an argument using images as evidence, one needs practice.
This skill cannot be learned from seeing others do it;
students have to practice constructing an argument using
images themselves.
After the lecture,
a lively discussion followed, in which such issues were
addressed as when to use an original or a representation;
does writing about images require a separate set of skills;
and why is it that we tend to treat images so differently
(non critically) from text? Was this skill set neglected
in our education? But, however "illiterate" we
might be, Rando emphasized that visual fluency is certainly
something that can be taught and learned.
The first example
of how images can be used to provide evidence for historical
developments was provided by Douglas
W. Rae, Richard
S. Ely Professor of Organization and Management,
School of Management, with his presentation Using
Images to Learn about the City. The speaker,
who called himself "a refugee from the era of the
35 mm slide," indicated that using visual resources
really changed his way of teaching, and that he now is
heavily depending on visual materials in the classroom.
The
University Libraries helped to create an inventory
of visual images, of which he makes enormous use, like
many of his colleagues.In his course on the Westinghouse
Winchester repeating arms factory, Rae uses images
to portray the drama of the strike in New Haven in 1979
and the key players in it. The story of all the factors
that contributed to what happened in 1979 is centered on
different themes through history and are discussed chronologically.
Photographs, datasets and maps are used as evidence of
historical evidence. Rae would argue that this method
of teaching is appropriate for the current generation of
students, which he characterizes as "post-literate." We
are clearly moving into an era where people learn
differently, and this is also apparent in some of the term
papers.
A striking example of this is a term paper
of a graduate student in the School of Art. In a nine minute
film, she describes what she sees when flying in a plane
over a straight line of 15 miles. The moving images provide
insight in the impact of ‘distance’ on
how people connect to information: one can describe
a city, but it does not come alive until one gets
down to what is going on a street corner, in a school,
and so on.
In the Q&A
portion of Rae's presentation, teaching of
non linear progression was discussed, as well as the importance
of providing comprehensive coherence through information
layering in teaching critical thinking.
The next
speaker, John Wargo, Professor of Environmental
Risk Analysis & Policy
Political Science, very literally demonstrated
how images can be used as evidence in his presentation Electronic
Imagery and Environmental Science.
The case
Wargo presented was that of a course on
former weapon storage on the island Vieques
in Portorico, a research project he has been
working on for five years. The question explored
was how the islanders might have been exposed
to pollutants over time. Information from
different disciplines, including highly specialized resources,
was needed to answer this question.What was
it like before the navy landed at the island?
What were possible ways of exposure to pollutants?
Photographs and area maps were available,
(a 1936 dataset that showed the situation before
the navy arrived), and new knowledge in the
form of historical overlays was created in
order to track changes in the community over time.
Other areas of research included the changes
in the environment and the influence of the
weather.Electronic information was critical
for structuring the research and engaging
students in the project, but no one was trained in finding
and using the information.
For this kind of
research, spatial resources and analysis
are crucial, and visual and electronic images
are increasingly used in teaching. Wargo concludes
by stating that Google Earth is going to
transform the public accessibility to visual imagery
(which Stace Maples will demonstrate later in the day).
Pericles
Lewis, Associate Professor of English and Comparative
Literature, and Director of Undergraduate Studies in Literature,
showed an approach from the Humanities in Teaching
Modernism in Literature and the Modern
Arts.
The speaker used his lecture on the modern
British novel to discuss the role of
images in teaching, and the different kinds of
use his students make of Yale special
collections.In a lecture on primitivism,
the students are given a sense of the
interaction among the various the arts:
music, literature, painting, film, and
dance. In addition, major themes of
primitivism in modern art are linked with a socio-historical
political background.
Visual resources
are used as evidence of influence of
different cultural developments on each other.For
their research papers, students are
asked to use primary materials from the Art
Gallery or the Beinecke Library (e.g.
a manuscript of Conrad’s
Heart of Darkness). In addition
a set of (scanned) archival materials,
like memorabilia, is available through
the
Beinecke
website.
And then there is the
class website, through which information
on the course, and images, are available.
The lectures are illustrated by representations
of originals that reside at Yale,
but other sources are used as well, like
a scene from H.G.
Wells' The Time
Machine.
Lewis's
experience is that 20 images in one 45/50 minutes lecture
are too much; he experiments with
using a maximum of 10/15. He is very happy
to get students into the Yale special
collections and learn about galleries
and archives as a place for discovery
and research. Students seem to appreciate
it, but it is still a challenge
how to teach students how to work with
the originals).
After the lecture, the audience
was interested in learning more
about how the students worked with the visual
materials in their research. Lewis
explains that curators gave tours and helped with "reading" visual
resources (interpretation);
or he would design questions that allow
students to take a look at the archive or artistic
material. For example, students
were asked to compare representations of
themes in the different arts.
The experience suggests that students tend to use the
materials they are pointed to
but sometimes also come up with their own materials.
John
Faragher, Arthur Unobskey Professor of American
History, was one of the first people to take advantage
of the library services that included digitizing
thousands of images from the
Yale collections on Western Americana at the Beinecke
library. This resulted in revising
the original course.In this presentation Teaching
with Images from Yale Collection
of Western Americana,
an in-depth example of "close
reading" of
images is provided. In this
particular lecture, MFaragher
uses depictions of native Americans
by Europeans to provide insight
in the European view on this
continent and its inhabitants.
What is prominent in the images,
what is left out and why? How
do these images represent ideologies
of that time? Students learn
about why the images are what
they are (understanding the
images) by looking at the context:
who created them, when, where,
who was the audience?, etc.
Resources
used include the first European
image of America in a letter
published by Columbus in 1494, in which the nakedness of
the natives is predominant. This has a meaning:
the absence of clothing becomes
a metaphor of absence of civilization.
Other examples include the
Nurnberg Chronicle of 1493, Vespucci’s
De Duovo
Mundo (1505), 17th
century books on the New World,
and 16th century watercolors,
depicting native Americans.
Some images were first hand
reports (watercolors), others
interpretations of texts (Columbus).
The different versions (e.g.
engravings from watercolors)
provide opportunity to compare
the different versions of
the images. In addition, there
is the intertextuality of
images, a fascinating story!
Faragher supports Rae's
finding that students are
good at reading images.
This "visual
generation" is
accustomed to doing it.
But it is crucial that visual
resources are brought at
a highly intellectual level,
as evidence, not just as
illustrations. His students
work with digital images,
particularly the originals
(they are expected to use
Yale Special Collections
for their term paper). In
his lectures, Faragher
clearly links the images
to the books of which they
are a part. He thinks that
the availability of digital
images increases the use
of the library collections,
quite contradictory to what
some might expect.
The next presentation, Writing
for the Web,
by English Lecturer
Roberta
Stuart, was
a very interesting
example of how to
teach student to "speak" with
images and form (web
design) in teaching
writing skills. In
her writing course,
Stuart aims to
show students that
research and writing
are connected with
reality outside the
classroom. So she
looks for topics that
students are familiar
with (e.g. student
volunteering) and
formats that they
encounter, like texts
on websites. For one
of the writing courses,
students had to design
websites for voluntary
agencies for which
they already work.
The resulting web-sites
would be used by these
agencies. Students
had to conduct interviews,
gain permission for
photographs, etc.,
and they were taught
design and tools.
They had to apply
design concepts and
an appropriate way
of writing (50% reduction
of words!) to communicate
their message.
Another
course focuses on
the "working
poor" in
New Haven. Here, students
had to use images
to explain medical
specialisms for
people with limited
English language
skills and for whom
the medical infrastructure
was new.In these
writing courses,
students learned
about writing for
public with an eye
for the visual,
with all the responsibility
that is attached
to it. Finding images
is part of the work
and important for
the quality of the
result.
In a discussion
with the audience,
the speaker explained
that she introduces
students to (special,
visual) collections
by having them
find images themselves,
and by providing
a prize as an
incentive. In addition, students
are required to
contact a librarian
in special collections.
In
his presentation How
to Look at a
Building,
Sandy
Isenstadt,
Associate Professor of Art and School
of Architecture,
explained that
in architecture,
images play
a complex role.
They represent
part of what
a real three
dimensional
building is.
You have to
use many images,
plus indications
of physical
relations to
be able to visualize
a building that
you cannot experience
by going there.
In context of
classroom one
only has 2-D
images to convey
3-D objects
to help students
develop 3-D
visualization
in minds.In
looking at an
image, you have
to be clear
about the strengths
and limits of
that particular
image; what
can it tell
you and what
not, how can
it lie? And
then there is
a physical relationship
with buildings
(distance).
Different images
are of interest
to different
types of students:
- identifying buildings on a map
(looking for a certain shape)
- comparing views of two similar
buildings
- how buildings are represented
in different media.
Close reading of images in Architecture classes, images are
used of evidence of:
- influence
or origins of a certain style; one can now combine
images to make a connection (& setup a visual hierarchy)
- placement of the buildings in
culture (by depicting ephemera)
- how new technology is incorporated
in architecture (e.g. railroad)
- new construction technologies,
depicted in a certain way (e.g. incomplete).
- mythmaking going on in images
And then there is one challenge left;
how does one talk about images of unbuilt buildings?In
the discussion that followed, the speaker mentioned as greatest
challenge learning how to use tools for importing and
presenting images. With regard to tailoring collections
to his needs, Isenstadt emphasized that he likes to
let the images he finds influence the intended content.
Stace
Maples, Geographic Information Systems Assistant, Map
CollectionGIS wizard Stace Maples (GIS Systems Assistant
of Sterling’s Map Collection)
demonstrated in his lecture Free
and Easy: Using Spatial Data and Imagery for Instruction,
that 3-D images might be available soon. He explored how
new tools might help teachers to "speak with images" to
create geospatial context. GIS systems are expensive and
there is a steep learning curve, but there is a way to
provide non-GIS users with the power to provide geo-spatial
context for their teaching content: Google
Earth.
Google
Earth provides tools that are fairly easy to use,
to place features (images, place marks, etc.) of one's own
creation into Google Earth sessions, save them in jpeg format
and share them with others. Google Earth uses KML, an XML-based
language.The Map Collection
Department of Yale University Libraries explore
these tools to provide access to the map collection, creating
dynamic "units" of
information by digitizing print maps, data sets,
etc. and creating data-layers
The first and last
speaker of the day, William
Rando, closed the
workshop with an appropriate topic: Using
Assessment to Enhance Instruction and Library Service. What, after all
efforts are made, is the impact of using images
in teaching? What difference does it really make?As
part of the ELI project, an assessment model was
developed and field-tested in a collaborative
setting with faculty, teaching center staff and librarians
(see: Danuta A. Nitecki and William Rando, ‘A
library and teaching center collaboration to assess
the impact of using digital images on teaching,
learning, and library support’, in
Vine, Vol. 34 (2004), No. 3, pp. 119-125.). The
model consists of different rubrics and tries
to map the intended learning outcomes, the way
the teacher actually uses images in teaching and
appropriate library services. The model is based
on the principle that learning goals have to align
with the way images are used in teaching and with
the level of library services. For example, if
images are used as "edutainment" and
the students are expected to learn how to use
visual resources in making a historical argument,
there is a mismatch between methodology and learning
outcomes. The approach particularly emphasizes
the usefulness of assessment results for teachers.Conclusion
After an exiting day, Danuta
Nitecki closed the
workshop by thanking speakers and audience, summarizing
remarks and some questions to take home:
- What challenges do we face to
collecting, organizing, and describing visual resources?
- Do new tools
create a new kind of collection? If so, how do we preserve
these ‘teaching objects’?
- What is the impact
on the role of the librarian and faculty with regards
to supporting this kind of use and collections in the
21 st century.
|